Scored assessments

Risk assessment form with weighted scoring and PDF reports

Build a scored risk assessment form that weights each answer, shows the project lead their risk level, routes high scores to review and emails a PDF.

What your team sees

A risk assessment form is easy to send out and hard to act on. Scores get added up by hand, high-risk projects wait in someone’s inbox, and the project lead never hears back. This walkthrough builds a scored project risk assessment for Merrow Housing Trust, a fictional housing association: it weights each answer, shows the lead their result, sends high scores to review and emails a PDF report.

It is a configuration pattern, not a case study or a risk methodology. Set your own weights and thresholds with whoever owns risk.

Build the risk assessment form

The form, Project risk assessment, has four pages:

  1. Project: project name, the lead’s name and Email, directorate (Dropdown), budget (Number with a £ prefix and a minimum of 0) and go-live date (Date).
  2. Risk: four Single choice questions, about personal data, the effect on tenants’ services if the project fails, who delivers it and how fixed the deadline is.
  3. Readiness: Yes or no questions for a named sponsor, a rollback plan and, only when the project handles personal data, a data protection impact assessment. Then a repeating group, Key risks, with each risk, its likelihood and impact (Rating, 1 to 5) and a mitigation.
  4. Your result: the score and what happens next.

Make every scored question Required. See pages and repeaters and conditional logic.

Weighted scoring with calculated values

FormWork has no separate scoring setting. Choice options carry the points, and a calculated field adds them up on the server.

On each Single choice question, open the Options tab and type a number as each option’s value: “No personal data” 0, “Staff data” 2, “Tenants’ data” 3, “Health data” 4. The entry stores the value, and formulas treat it as a number.

Add a read-only Number field, Risk score. Under Default value, choose Calculation and apply the weights in the formula: personal data and service impact count three times, delivery twice, the deadline once, and IF adds points for a large budget and missing readiness items. Part of it, as text:

={{entry:current.answers.personal_data}}*3 + {{entry:current.answers.service_impact}}*3 + {{entry:current.answers.delivery}}*2 + IF({{entry:current.answers.sponsor}}, 0, 3)

Keep it on one line, and insert answers with + Reference. Here the score runs from 0 to 46: under 10 is low, 10 to 17 medium, 18 or more high. A second read-only Text field, Risk level, calculates =IF(score >= 18, "High", IF(score >= 10, "Medium", "Low")), where score stands for the inserted Risk score. See calculated values and defaults.

Two details matter for scoring:

  • A calculation stays empty until every answer it uses has a value. The impact assessment question is hidden for projects without personal data, so give it a fallback, |default:1.
  • Hiding a question doesn’t delete its answer, so a “No” given before personal data changed to none still counts. Check personal data in the formula too, in outline IF(personal_data = 0, 0, IF(dpia_done, 0, 4)).

Inside Key risks, a calculated field can multiply each risk’s likelihood by its impact, using Current instance in the picker. Those ratings go in the report, not the score.

Show the result to the respondent

Values are worked out each time an answer is saved, so the result is ready on the last page. You can show it in three places:

  • The calculated fields on the result page, read only so people can’t type over them.
  • A paragraph in Template mode that explains it, such as “A risk reviewer will look at this first” for High. See template syntax.
  • The success message, with Format set to HTML template, repeating the risk level and inserting Status link for respondents. See form settings.

Showing the score before submission lets people see which answers lower it. If that matters, show the level only after submission. Read only stops people changing the score in the form, but it is still an answer, not a locked value. If a wrong score would cause harm, repeat the formula in a Calculate step in the automation and route on that result.

Route high scores to a risk review

On the form’s Process page, set up the stages. Entries start in Submitted when they are submitted.

StageKindOwner and due timeMoves on with
SubmittedOpenThe Project office group, due in 3 daysAccept, or Send to risk review
Risk reviewOpenThe Risk and assurance group, due in 5 daysSend for approval, Accept with conditions or Not approved, each with a required comment except the first
Waiting for approvalWaiting, needs approvalNo owner. The Directors group, At least 2, links expire after 7 daysApproved to Accepted, rejected to Not approved
Accepted, Not approvedClosedNone

Then add an automation, Score and route assessments, that runs When the Form is submitted:

  1. Update entry or row on This entry copies Risk score into a Score at submission team field, kept if answers are corrected later.
  2. If, with a branch labelled “High risk”: Risk score Is at least 18. Inside it, Move to stage Risk review, with the comment “Scored 18 or more”. Otherwise stays empty, so low and medium scores wait in Submitted for the project office.
  3. Generate PDF, described below.
  4. Send email to the lead’s Email answer, with the PDF attached and the status link in the message.

Reviewers record their judgement in team fields, Agreed risk level and Review notes, and find their work in My work. See stages, owners and due dates and approvals.

Generate a PDF risk report

On the project’s Templates page, create a PDF document template, “Project risk report”, and a Layout with your letterhead around {{ content }}. The report uses template values such as template.project, template.score and template.level, and a loop over template.risks for the key risks table. See templates.

In the Generate PDF step:

  • File name: Risk assessment - followed by the project name, ending .pdf.
  • Content: Template, “Project risk report”. Under Template data, map each value to an answer, and template.risks to the Key risks group.
  • Layout: Template layout with the letterhead.
  • Generated file access: Admin only, since the lead gets it by email.

In Send email, select Add attachment reference and choose the PDF. From this step the run carries on in the background, so a failure doesn’t undo the submission; turn on Email admins when an automation run fails and check runs.

Keep people informed

  • Tell the project lead the outcome: Stage changes, To Accepted or Not approved, then Send email with the comment from the move.
  • The Remind the owner when a stage is overdue template, for Submitted and Risk review. FormWork doesn’t email owners about new or overdue work otherwise.
  • In a stage too long on Waiting for approval for 3 days, then Remind approvers.
  • Respondent status, with neutral labels: “Received” for Submitted, “Being reviewed” for Risk review and Waiting for approval, “Accepted” and “Decision made”.

Leave the Email the person who filled it in notification off; the automation’s email already carries the report and status link.

Limits to plan around

  • Everyone in the account can open every assessment, including review notes. Groups decide who owns work, not who can see it. See team members and roles.
  • An entry is in one stage at a time, so parallel checks, such as data protection and finance, belong in team fields or in stages one after the other.
  • Due times count calendar time, not working days.

Test these cases before you publish

  • The lowest and highest possible answers, and a score of exactly 10 and exactly 18.
  • A project with no personal data, and one where the lead answers the impact assessment question, then changes personal data to none.
  • Two directors approving, one rejecting, and links expiring.
  • The PDF with one key risk and with ten, and a long project name.

Change the scoring safely

Publish new weights as a new form version. Entries keep the questions they were answered with, while stages and automations follow the latest published version. Change weights in the formula, not option values: the entry stores the value, so changing it muddles older answers. Give each option in a question its own value, or the entry can’t tell them apart. Saving a report template with Save for immediate effect changes the next PDF without publishing; use Save as copy to try changes first.

What success looks like

Every assessment has a score you can trace to its answers, an owner and a stage. High scores reach a reviewer without anyone reading every form, and the project lead has a report and a decision. Measure turnaround yourself; this walkthrough doesn’t claim one.

For a review process without scoring, see application review. Compare plans or talk through your assessment.

More use cases

All use cases
Quotes and pricing

Accountancy quotes

A quote form that adapts its questions, prices bookkeeping, accounts, VAT and payroll as people answer, and hands each enquiry to an adviser.

Read the use case
Applications and approvals

Application review

Collect applications with conditional questions, move each one through review and approval stages, and keep the questions behind every response.

Read the use case
Onboarding

Client onboarding

Collect companies, contacts and documents, move each onboarding through your team's stages, and hand structured answers to another system.

Read the use case
Travel approvals

Travel requests

A travel request form that estimates the trip's cost, asks the budget holder to approve anything over £1,000 and hands the trip to the travel desk.

Read the use case
Spend approvals

Purchase approvals

A purchase approval form with line items and a calculated total that routes each request by spend limit to budget holders, finance and directors.

Read the use case
New starters

Employee onboarding

An employee onboarding form for hiring managers, with HR, IT and facilities stages, an equipment list and reminders timed from the start date.

Read the use case
Supplier due diligence

Supplier onboarding

A supplier onboarding form for due diligence that collects company, insurance and bank details, scores risk, routes approval and hands off to finance.

Read the use case
Returns and claims

Returns and claims

A returns and warranty claim form that collects order details and photos, routes each claim through triage and lets customers check progress by link.

Read the use case
Event bookings

Event registration

An event registration form that books several attendees at once, prices each place from a data table and takes payment through Stripe Checkout.

Read the use case
Sales leads

Lead qualification

A lead qualification form that scores each enquiry, shares sales-ready leads between reps in turn, chases first contact and hands leads to your CRM.

Read the use case